top of page

Labour’s capital gains tax: sell and pay 28%, hold until death and pay nothing

Writer: Kieran Trass
Kieran Trass
14 minutes ago
3 min read

Author: Kieran Trass

Head of Research, Staircase.

Property cycle analyst and author of five books on the New Zealand market.

Under Labour’s capital gains tax as written, an investor who sells pays 28% on the gain. An investor who holds until death pays nothing, and their heirs never pay tax on that past gain either. That is why the first Housing Compass report gave a verdict of “no” on Labour’s first claim: that the tax will move money out of property and into businesses.



What Labour says the tax will do


Labour says too much of New Zealand’s wealth is locked in property. It says the tax will free that money up for businesses, innovation and jobs, but has not said how it would measure that.


It also says the money the tax raises will go to health.


What the design actually does


The tax is paid when you sell and waived while you hold. Every year an investor keeps a property is a year the tax does not apply. And because death is not treated as a sale, holding until death removes the tax altogether.


Kieran Trass, Head of Research at Staircase, shows this with one investor and two choices. She owns a rental worth $800,000 on 1 July 2027, the day the tax would start. The example is for illustration only.


Side by side comparison of one investor's two choices under Labour's capital gains tax. Choice one: she sells in 2032 to put the money into a business and pays 28% on the gain since July 2027, including the part that is inflation. Choice two: she holds the rental until she dies, pays no tax, and her heirs take the property at its new value without paying tax on the past gain.
Figure 1. One investor, two choices under Labour's capital gains tax as written. Selling in 2032 to fund a business is taxed at 28%. Holding until death is not taxed at all.

Same investor, same property. She pays 28% for doing what Labour asks, and nothing for doing the opposite.


Labour’s diagnosis is that wealth is locked in property. The design adds another lock.


Inflation makes selling cost more


The gain is not adjusted for inflation. So the investor who sells pays tax on the part of the price rise that is just prices going up generally.


At 2% inflation a year, an $800,000 rental is worth about $975,000 after 10 years. That $175,000 “gain” is all inflation, and at 28% the tax on it is $49,000. The investor who holds pays none of it.


Four figures from a worked inflation example under Labour's capital gains tax: a starting value of $800,000 on 1 July 2027, a value of $975,000 after 10 years at 2% inflation, a gain of $175,000 that is entirely inflation, and tax of $49,000 at 28%. Below, the investor who sells pays $49,000 and the investor who holds pays $0.
Worked example at 2% inflation a year for 10 years. The $175,000 rise is entirely inflation. The investor who sells pays $49,000 tax on it. The investor who holds pays nothing.

The longer the hold, the bigger the gap between the two choices.


Who this affects most


Older investors feel it first. An investor who sells to fund their retirement pays the tax. One who keeps the property pays nothing, and passes it on tax-free.


Business owners looking for investment also lose out, because the money they need stays in property until the owner sells.


What would bring the design closer to Labour’s goal


The report suggests two changes that would make the tax do what Labour says. Neither drops the tax.


  1. Tax the gain at death, or pass the starting value on to the heirs. Either the estate pays at death, or the heirs inherit the 1 July 2027 starting value and pay when they sell. Holding forever stops being the tax-free exit. This is the only change that serves both of Labour’s main aims: moving money out of property, and raising more for health, sooner.

  2. No tax if the money goes into a business. The tax is deferred when the sale proceeds go into a qualifying business within a set time, such as two years. The tax then falls on the investor who cashes out, not the one who does what Labour asks. The trade-off is less money for health, and Inland Revenue would have to define “business” and police it.


How we will know


If the tax goes ahead, the report sets a baseline of the 12 months before it starts, then checks the results on 1 July 2028, 2030 and 2032. Two measures will show whether money has moved out of property:


  • The share of homes bought by investors, with existing homes and new builds tracked separately (Cotality report).

  • Business investment levels according to Stats NZ.


Timeline for measuring Labour's capital gains tax with five points: a baseline from 1 July 2026 to 30 June 2027, the tax starting on 1 July 2027 when every covered property gets its starting value, and re-scores on 1 July 2028, 1 July 2030 and 1 July 2032. Two measures sit beneath the timeline: the share of homes bought by investors with existing homes and new builds tracked separately, sourced from Cotality, and business investment, sourced from Stats NZ.
The measurement timeline from the Housing Compass report. The baseline is the 12 months before the tax starts on 1 July 2027. Results are re-scored on 1 July 2028, 2030 and 2032 using the share of homes bought by investors (Cotality) and business investment (Stats NZ).


Comments

Rated 0 out of 5 stars.
No ratings yet

Add a rating

This publication has been provided for general information only. Although every effort has been made to ensure this publication is accurate the contents should not be relied upon or used as a basis for entering into any products described in this publication. To the extent that any information or recommendations in this publication constitute financial advice, they do not take into account any person’s particular financial situation or goals. We strongly recommend readers seek independent legal/financial advice prior to acting in relation to any of the matters discussed in this publication. No person involved in this publication accepts any liability for any loss or damage whatsoever which may directly or indirectly result from any advice, opinion, information, representation, or omission, whether negligent or otherwise, contained in this publication.

bottom of page