The Long Downturn Is Not the Story. The Next Cycle Is.
Updated: Sep 22
 | Author: Kieran Trass Head of Research, Staircase. Property cycle analyst and author of five books on the New Zealand market. |
New Zealand’s property downturn is now long enough, deep enough and painful enough that it deserves serious attention.
Liam Dann is right to call it one of the most significant housing downturns in modern New Zealand history. He is also right that, in inflation-adjusted terms, the fall looks brutal.
The latest QV House Price Index shows the average New Zealand home is worth $912,190, down 14.2 percent from the previous market peak in early 2022. Auckland is 22.3 percent below peak. Wellington is 27.6 percent below peak. Once inflation is added, the real fall is far larger.
So let’s not pretend this has been a mild correction. It has not.
But the real question is not whether the downturn has been painful. It has. The real question is what the downturn actually proves.
And in my view, it proves something very different from the popular conclusion now forming around the market and reveals what investors should expect from the next property cycle.
It proves the danger of buying at the top of an artificial credit boom. It does not prove that property investment is dead. |
The 2021 peak was not normal
A lot of today’s commentary starts from the 2021 peak and then measures everything against it.
That is understandable, but it is also dangerous.
The 2021 property market was not a normal market. It was a market distorted by emergency interest rates, closed borders, heavy stimulus, limited spending options, FOMO, and a widespread belief that prices could only keep rising.
That belief was wrong.
The Reserve Bank took the OCR to extraordinary lows through the pandemic period; credit was cheap, and buyers were making decisions in conditions that were never going to last. When the inflation shock arrived and interest rates rose, prices had to adjust.
That does not make the price falls imaginary. Anyone who bought near the peak knows the pain is real. But it does mean the peak itself was a poor benchmark for assessing long-term value.
Measuring today’s market against late 2021 is like measuring a person’s normal heart rate against the moment they were sprinting from danger. It tells you something, but not everything.
The Covid boom pulled future growth forward. The downturn since then has been the market giving much of that excess back.
A long downturn is not the same as a broken market
There is a subtle but important difference between saying this downturn has lasted a long time and saying the property market is structurally broken.
The first statement is a fact. The second is a conclusion. And it is not yet proven.
QV’s own language is important. It describes the market as treading water and patchy, not collapsing. National values rose 0.3 percent in the three months to May 2026.
Christchurch has already regained its previous nominal peak. Queenstown, Invercargill and Greymouth are also at or above previous peaks. Auckland and Wellington remain weak, but the national story is no longer a single story.
That matters.
There is no single New Zealand property market. Many local markets are moving at different speeds, for different reasons, with different supply pipelines, affordability levels, employment bases, rental conditions and buyer profiles.
Auckland is not Christchurch. Wellington is not Queenstown. A townhouse market affected by excess stock is not the same as a scarce land market in a constrained location.
A long national downturn tells us the average has been weak. It does not tell us every market, every property type, and every investor is facing the same future.
The next property cycle will not reward blind speculation
Where I agree with Liam is this: the old idea that almost any second property would automatically create wealth is gone, at least for now.
That was never a proper investment strategy. It was just leverage plus rising prices.
The next cycle will be different.
It will not reward investors who buy blindly, ignore cashflow, overpay for poor stock, assume capital gains will rescue every mistake, or treat property investment as a one-way bet.
But that is not bad news for disciplined investors.
It simply means the market is becoming more selective.
That is exactly what happens after a major downturn. Weak assumptions get exposed. Poor purchases get punished. Overleveraged owners are forced to reassess. Developers become more cautious. Banks tighten their view of risk. Buyers start asking better questions.
That is not the death of the market. That is the market getting more rational.
Real prices matter, but investors do not live in real price charts
Inflation adjusted house price data is useful. It helps us understand the real economic value of housing over time.
But it is not the full investment story.
A property investor does not buy a chart. They buy a specific property, at a specific price, with a specific loan, rent, tax position, maintenance profile, and holding period.
They also repay nominal debt with future nominal income.
That matters because inflation does two things at once. It can reduce the real value of house prices, but it can also reduce the real burden of fixed debt over time, provided income and rent rise sufficiently. That does not make inflation painless. It clearly is not. But it does mean real price charts alone cannot tell the whole story.
The investment question is not simply: How far are prices below the 2021 peak?
The better question is: What is the relationship between today’s price, today’s rent, today’s interest rate, today’s lending conditions, today’s tax settings, and the likely supply and demand position over the next cycle?
That is a very different question. And it leads to a much more useful answer.
The supply story is not as settled as some think
One of the more optimistic arguments in the current debate is that New Zealand is now building enough homes, and that zoning reform means we are unlikely to repeat the underbuilding mistakes of the past.
There is some truth in that.
Stats NZ reported 39,087 new homes consented in the year ended April 2026, up 16 percent from the previous year. That is a significant number.
But consents are not completions. Completions are not necessarily affordable homes. Affordable homes are not necessarily in the locations where people most need them.
And even when the right homes are built, they still need to be held in the right tenure. A home sold to an owner occupier helps home ownership, but it does not automatically help rental supply.
This is where the rebalancing narrative becomes too simple.
Yes, more housing supply is good. Yes, excessive speculation should not be the foundation of a healthy housing system.
But if policy settings, weak yields, high compliance costs, rising insurance, uncertain interest rates and poor sentiment push private rental investors out of the market, then rental supply can tighten even while total dwelling supply looks adequate on paper.
That is not a theoretical issue.
The 2023 Census data shows that 84.6 percent of renting households, where landlord type was available, rented from a private person, trust or business. Kāinga Ora accounted for 11.2 percent. Local authorities, community housing providers, iwi, hapū, Māori land trusts and other government entities made up the balance.
In plain English, most renters still rely on private rental providers.
When people celebrate a market that sidelines landlords, they need to answer a practical question: who replaces that rental supply, at what cost, and how quickly? |
Migration is not booming, but it is not irrelevant
Another argument being used to support the long flat market view is weaker migration.
Again, there is some truth in that. Net migration is nowhere near the extraordinary post Covid surge.
But the direction matters.
Stats NZ reported provisional annual net migration of 24,200 in the March 2026 year, compared with 14,000 in the March 2025 year. That is not a boom, but it is a material increase from the prior year.
The point is not that migration will suddenly rescue house prices.
The point is that demand pressure is dynamic. It changes. It does not sit still for a decade because one forecast says it will.
Population flows, credit settings, interest rates, wages, construction costs, rental availability and confidence all move. Property cycles are created by the interaction of those forces, not by one statistic in isolation.
Interest rates have changed the recovery path
The current recovery is also being complicated by interest rate uncertainty.
The Reserve Bank held the OCR at 2.25 percent on 27 May 2026, but the decision was not a simple rates are low, recovery can resume signal. The Committee was split three votes to three, with the chair’s casting vote keeping the OCR unchanged. The Reserve Bank also said OCR increases were likely to be required this year, while forecasting inflation to peak at 4.3 percent in the September 2026 quarter before returning to the 2 percent midpoint in mid 2027.
That means the market is not yet receiving a clean interest rate tailwind.
Borrowers are more cautious. Banks are more cautious. Investors are more selective. Developers are more exposed to feasibility risk. Households are still dealing with higher living costs.
This helps explain why the market has not bounced quickly.
But it does not prove it cannot recover.
It means the next phase is likely to be uneven, regionally fragmented and more sensitive to quality, cashflow and affordability than the broad boom years were.
Policy settings now look different from the slump years
There is another part of the story that deserves more attention.
The policy environment for property investors has changed.
Interest deductibility has been restored. Inland Revenue states that from 1 April 2025, residential property owners can claim 100 percent of the interest incurred, subject to the usual rules.
The bright line test has also returned to two years for residential property sold on or after 1 July 2024, according to Inland Revenue’s rental income guidance.
Those changes do not magically make every investment viable. They do not remove the need for careful analysis. They do not guarantee capital gains.
But they do improve the economics of rental property compared with the most punitive period of the last cycle.
That matters because investors respond to incentives. If the economics improve, some investors will return. If the economics deteriorate again, some will exit. That is how supply responds.
The cultural shift is real, but it may not mean what people think
Liam Dann’s most interesting point is not the data itself. It is the possibility of a cultural shift.
He may be right that the easy faith in property has been damaged.
But I do not think that means New Zealanders will stop seeing property as a serious wealth-building asset.
I think the shift is more specific.
The culture is moving away from blind faith in capital gains.
It is moving away from the idea that any property, bought at any price, in any location, with any cashflow, will eventually work out.
That shift is overdue. But it is not anti-property. It is pro discipline.
The investors who do best in the next cycle are likely to be the ones who understand five things:
Timing matters. Buying after a major reset is very different from buying at the peak of a boom.
Cashflow matters. Capital growth cannot be the only leg of the stool.
Asset selection matters. Location, dwelling type, land component, scarcity and tenant demand will separate strong purchases from weak ones.
Debt structure matters. Interest rate assumptions need to be tested, not guessed.
Local cycles matter. National averages are useful, but they are not a buying strategy.
That is the real lesson.
Not that property no longer works.
But that property no longer forgives poor thinking as easily as it did during the cheap money era.
The danger now is fighting the last war
The biggest risk in the market right now is that people draw the wrong lesson from the downturn.
Some will say the lesson is never buy property. That is too simplistic. Others will say the lesson is that property always bounces, so just buy anything. That is also too simplistic.
The better lesson is this:
The 2021 peak showed what happens when cheap credit, FOMO, and poor discipline take over. The 2022 to 2026 downturn showed what happens when those assumptions are forced back to reality. The next cycle will show who learned the difference. |
For first home buyers, this reset has created more choice and better negotiating conditions than existed during the boom.
For investors, it has created a market where numbers matter again.
For policymakers, it should be a warning that affordability, rental supply, development feasibility and credit conditions cannot be treated as separate issues. They are one system.
And for the media, it should be a reminder that the longest downturn in modern history is not just a story about falling prices. It is a story about what comes after the fall.
The market has reset. That is not the same as broken.
New Zealand property has been through a brutal correction.
That should be acknowledged.
But a reset is not the same as a collapse. A long downturn is not the same as a permanent end to property investment. And a painful unwinding of the Covid boom is not proof that the next property cycle will never arrive.
The market ahead is unlikely to look like the market from 1995 to 2021. It will probably be more selective, more regionally uneven, more sensitive to interest rates, and less forgiving of poor investment decisions.
That is not a reason to walk away. It is a reason to be better prepared.
The investors who succeed from here will not be the ones who believe property always goes up.
They will be the ones who understand why it fell, where it has reset, which markets are already diverging, and what conditions are needed before the next stage of the cycle properly begins.
The long downturn is not the whole story.
The next cycle is.
This downturn does not prove property investment is dead. It proves that buying blindly at the top of a credit boom was never a strategy. |
Kieran Trass is Head of Market Research at Staircase and author of Grow Richer with the Property Cycle.
This commentary reflects the author’s independent analysis. It is general information only and does not constitute financial advice.
Comments